130. Transhumanism 8/28: The New Psychological Weapon

The podcast is available at https://youtu.be/ZPH7yRnm-rc.

The representatives of transhumanism question the perfection of sacred creation by neglecting the exercising of human free will. For the sake of profit, they are building a digital and global control network dedicated to the comprehensive surveillance, tracking, monitoring, and restriction of the human being. However, for this new digital communism, surveillance capitalism, or centralized economy to function, the loss of individual liberty must be accompanied by the manipulation of human relations—for instance, by inciting conflict, increasing individualization, creating division, and dissolving existing networks of trust. The principle of "divide and conquer" is successfully applied here as well. In our over-loud, over-mediatized, and over-politicized daily lives, we directly experience a war of thoughts, words, and actions, where truth battles against transhumanist lies. The eternal truths tied to human existence are engaged in an informational and psychological battle with transhumanist representatives interested in manipulation. Now the trouble is that, as in other historical events, man must defend himself against the attack. The goal of this perceptible hidden battle is to change human behaviour. To this end, transhumanism can deploy a wide range of "weapons" against the defensive, abandoned, and individualistic person—who is precisely for these reasons easily influenced and has no weapon other than their consciousness. Those who remain ignorant, unaware that they themselves are the ones sustaining the transhumanist power, are the unarmed traitors.

According to Hajdu, the strength, virtue, and truth of the defensive person come from their ability to cling to the values, convictions, and moral behaviour of their parents and grandparents, to their national culture and tradition, to their faith, and to the conduct of their ancestors worthy of respect—all of which form the basis for their self-determination and self-regulation. In self-determination, there is neither fear nor hatred. Among the weapons of attacking transhumanism are tools such as the exclusion of views that differ from the mainstream world-view, stigmatization, marginalization, the sowing of confusion, the generation of uncertainty and doubt, and the incitement of fear and distrust toward others—for instance, toward government policies, the justice system, and their leaders—all of which lead to the destruction of traditional communal bonds. The efforts of attacking transhumanism can even be compared to the biblical efforts of Lucifer, because the essence here, too, is the destruction of social bonds and self-identity, which are the very things that can make a person and a nation strong. All these body-mind tools encourage the ignorant to destroy themselves from within as people who have lost all hope. If an ignorant individual is capable of destroying themselves from within, they are capable of destroying their own society and nation as well.

The essence of the attack is to dismantle the universal connection between the One and the human being; for example, by deifying behaviour driven by the individual self. This involves praising singles, transvestites, and supporters of gender theories, while maximizing the fame of successful business figures, idols, actors, and major pop and rock stars with whom the ignorant can identify and, moreover, consider models. The core of psychological warfare is to ensure that we always wait for help and solutions from the outside—including external information gathering—rather than from within ourselves. There is only one obstacle to this psychological war: the conscious human. If the originally conscious human can be made ignorant through various manipulative and influencing procedures, then the only obstacle to transhumanism is removed. Among the numerous manipulation techniques, they have thus far achieved success with the following:

1. Presenting appearance as reality: countless digital platforms attempt to persuade their users to believe that the only existing reality is what they perceive with their five senses. This further implies that anything not perceived in this manner is false. The goal of this manipulation is to create "information islands" that the perceiving individual believes to be the objective truth. For example, social media algorithms and search engines are capable of providing personalized information because they learn which information interests us. The point is that the algorithms continuously offer us links that mirror our own perspective. Consequently, the user believes their viewpoint is so important and widespread that everyone else sees the same thing. In truth, they do not. The system creates separate information islands for everyone.

2. The manipulative use of guilt, fear, and compassion: transhumanism compels human communities, political decision-makers, etc., to initiate and implement the changes that transhumanist representatives require. A relevant example of this influence is the explanation of climate change, which was devised to arose a sense of guilt in humans for things like desertification, the melting of icebergs, the drying up of rivers, forest fires, etc. We are told we suffer because, for instance, we use fossil fuels, and agriculture involves many methane-emitting cows. The shift to a vegan, meat-free diet, as well as state subsidies for electric cars, is part of this "climate hysteria." It is as if we have forgotten that the Earth's climate is a complex, dynamic system under constant change, where even the position of the North Pole shifts. What we classify as climate change is a manifestation of this complex cycle. Furthermore, the increased CO2 levels in the atmosphere originate primarily not from fossil fuels and agriculture, but from the outgassing of the oceans. Global warming followed by global cooling has always existed and will continue to exist.

3. Surrendering ourselves because "there is no solution": the Covid-19 infection and climate hysteria are two manipulative examples suggesting that if we do not meet the expectations of decision-makers, we will face severe, perhaps irreversible consequences. That is, if we do not act quickly enough, it will be too late to avoid the deaths of millions. Regarding the infection, the message was that new, previously unused therapies had to be developed. Regarding climate change, the message is that we only have a few years left to begin a new way of managing resources that reduces the use of fossil fuels. Therefore, we are told to travel less, change our diets (e.g. eat less meat), use electric transportation, etc. The manipulator does not mention that alternative solutions have always been available to humanity. We owe to ourselves to acquire enough knowledge to understand our only eternal home and its sacredness so that we do not believe in these apparent crises—or at least view them critically, such as climate hysteria. Before making a decision or committing to a particular stance, we should ask: Is this truly the case?