96. The backstage power network

 The audio recording is available at https://youtu.be/tohkFOBIgnY. 

In addition to the previously mentioned institutionalized power tools such as psychology, science, media, law, legislation, economics, and religious horizontal systems of lies, it is also necessary to mention the vertical organizations of power, which unify these horizontal manipulative tools. This is the controlling vertical network. The network’s structure and verticality apply to the organizing backstage power, the executive apparatus, and institutional and individual authorities. The transparency of the three layers increases from the organizing power to the authorities. In manipulation, the organizing backstage power is completely invisible, which is why terms like "deep state" (the state within the state) and "deep church" (the church within the church) are often used. What becomes increasingly visible are the executive apparatus and the authorities playing their roles—contractors, appointees, actors—such as politicians, financial professionals, psychologists, pseudo-scientists, and clergy. This can be deduced from their statements that contradict themselves, always with power acquisition at the centre, whether it's for a party leader role or obtaining a leadership position. The goal is always irresponsible power acquisition, not responsibility. The role of the media is, among other things, to prevent the surface world from learning about the deep world, either by not reporting on events, or distorting the reports if they do cover them. The media does not convey facts; they communicate pre-prepared press releases, not certainties but managed information. 

Since the deep state, a private religious backstage power network, is primarily financially dominant, it deceives the surface state, the weak network, the public power. This creates the conflict between private and public power. There has never been—and likely never will be—an example of public power deceiving private power, because private power is always on the offensive while public power is defensive. The attack serves to cover up private power’s weakness, which depends on public power for its existence. It derives its power and wealth by taking it from the public. Without public wealth, there is no private wealth. The highest caste, the backstage power network, has an interest in extending its power not only over finances but also over resources, energy sources, and land in a given country. See nowadays example in Ukraine. 

As a result of exploitation, these countries are left with no wealth except the people’s grey matter, which is limited because white-shirted soldiers from the national army desert to the global white-shirted army. Thus, the private international wealth power network’s precondition is the national public wealth; as otherwise, the pump has nothing to extract. The pump functions best when power can align not only with finances but also with law and legislation, justifying the need for exploitation with the help of economists and pseudo-scientists. At the international level, an example of such a money pump is the International Monetary Fund (IMF), created in 1944 under the Bretton Woods Agreement, which was established for currency lending, interest payments, debt creation, and discipline enforcement. 

The religious backstage power, through its manipulation tools—both hard (such as revolutions, wars) and soft (such as psychology, pseudo-sciences, law, economics)—can regulate the nature (quantity) and extent (quality) of the exploitation. It can do this because, in many cases, it regulates the money supply in the market, such as the amount of dollars, and, under the 1944 agreement, the price of certain goods, such as energy commodities like oil, is also tied to the dollar. In regulation, the principle of "divide and conquer" plays an important role, such as dividing political sides (right and left) or separating religious and non-religious people. Today, we have even reached the commercialization of human health, as seen with the COVID infection, where the modern slave society can be divided into the vaccinated and unvaccinated, those the power still needs and those it no longer needs. The selection is quantitative. It can be said that in this case, the materialist quantitative perspective has won, as people are treated as replaceable, one person being interchangeable with another. The backstage power does not care that man is a created sacred being, and if that was once the case, it no longer is. The sacredness, the quality, is lost; long live the mass, the quantity. 

If we briefly overview the current network’s functioning, we see that the backstage power is made up of a few hundred private power interest groups, significant banking families and corporation owners (e.g., Rothschild, Rockefeller, Oppenheimer, Montefiore, Wartburg), who today control more than two-thirds of the world's wealth. They are the idea generators, the owners of the ideology, the system administrators, who sometimes gather in groups such as the Bilderberg Group, the Trilateral Commission, and the Council on Foreign Relations to maintain and expand their power interests. Note: The backstage power network is run by about 300 banking families, approximately 7,000 people, through 150 multinational banks, 40,000 international corporations, and 30,000 foundations.