109. The third eye: Chapter 8 - The power model

 

Due to our imperfection, we model our lives, ourselves, and the world around us. The goal of modelling is to understand the external and internal, the material and spiritual, the lower and higher worlds as accurately as possible, in other words, the universal reality. Modelling serves to fill the gap caused by our ignorance. When we don’t know something, or when our knowledge is incomplete, we easily resort to modelling. A conscious person does not model the world because he or she is part of it. The model is for the ignorant external person. When we use the model avoiding to recognize and experience the universal reality and order, we create the trap of a false reality, which leads us to deny the truth. With our ignorance, the constructed false reality, illusion and system, we simultaneously establish our own limitations, and thus shut ourselves off from reality and the normal and full perception and experience of our lives.

The creation of models is always determined by the goals we want to achieve. When we model our material world, we primarily rely on our rational thinking and mathematical knowledge. For example the economic, judicial and political models, or those used in industries, such as logistics, business management and administration are derived from material and mathematical models. The natural sacredness given to us by the One as water, air, soil and light, which sustain life, cannot be modelled because their existence belongs to reality. This also explains why few models are used in agriculture. It has not yet been invented—and is unlikely to be—for example models for soil, water, air or light. We already have a model for artificial meat, and we are moving towards modelling humans, such as the creation of humanoid robots and machine driven societies. Order, reality, and natural sacredness do not need to be modelled because they exist with or without us. 

In the spiritual realm, modelling is generally referred to as religion, worldview, or dogma. In non-material religions, for example, the Creator was modelled and named God, with whom one could converse and make bargains, as described in the old scriptures. What language did the Creator spoke to the man, and what language did the man spoke to the Creator so they understood each other? What system of signs or codes did the imperfect man used to facilitate communication, or simply they only spoke through their own image and God model? How did they perceive God—white, black, yellow, brown, female, or male? Reality is always silent, while the model is always talkative. 

Models are imperfect, artificial (conceptual) systems created by humans, which lack the fundamental elements of universal order and hierarchical organization. They exist for two main purposes: to help us understand the complexity of the world around and within us—through distinctions, similarities, opposites, identities, etc.—and especially in the material world, to be used in practice. The model is created by one person for another, but it does not serve to understand human life. Rather, it concerns the conditions and concepts related to the false reality and systems, as the model is independent of both man and life. 

The characteristics of modelling include equality, linearity, compatibility, substitutability, comparability, measurability, and the closed system. When the model of equality, linearity, compatibility, substitutability and comparability was attempted on life, it failed, because human life is dynamic and due to its complexity, cannot be closed or measured. The ignorant thought, that if human life couldn’t be modelled, then humans themselves must be modelled—for example, through moral behaviour, psychology exploring ignorance, or fashion influencing clothing. Religious power modelled human life and humans themselves to strip them of their sacredness, self-determination, and self-consciousness that he/she is the One and Only image and identity. 

The goal of depriving humanity of universality was also to validate the correctness of the model, as seen, for example, in the dictatorial communist social model developed by the backstage power in 1848, known as the Communist Manifesto. Since the sacred human is part of the created reality, they cannot model themselves, they can only look in the mirror. Another feature of modelling is measurability and the closed system. If something cannot be measured, meaning it has no scale, it cannot be modelled. This is why the open, dynamic, ever-changing order cannot be modelled. Modelling assumes there is a reference point, therefore, modelling and quantitative statistics are closely related. Since our world is in constant motion and change, it can only be theoretically assumed that there exists a fixed starting point, such as the time of creation. Just as time has not stopped since creation, neither have changes. Then how can we model something that is in constant movement and change? Closed-system models are unsuitable for understanding dual reality, dynamic, open order, life, and humanity, but we still continue to force them. 

Beyond acquiring knowledge, the essence of modelling also lies in exercising power and fulfilling the desire for possession. It is no coincidence that the “function” of the body, mind, and soul were also attempted to be modelled. Those in power need the model and statistics to create the false reality, which they can sustain with various propaganda and marketing tools to justify their own truth. The false reality always shows only one side of dual pairs, the particular (partial). Through the model-man, power made them believe they are the centre of the world and that everything revolves around them. In the modelling of humanity, religious power first created the modern slave, a phenomenon we have witnessed from the 15th century to the present day. Then in the second stage, power is creating the robot-human, a process on-going today. 

The robot is the one-time-use model-human, no longer a sacred human, but a replaceable, executable, reprogrammable module or part in the machinery of religious power. The characteristic of our modern, accelerated world is thinking in terms of replaceable modules, and humans are not excluded from this. Think as example the exchangeable leaders in multinational companies or star football players. The focus is on the operability of the administrative apparatus. The ignorant rulers not only modelled the individual human but also human communities, creating social and community models, followed by the legal, economic, and political systems ensuring their operability, which they labelled capitalist, socialist, and democratic social models. In religion, the model is called Catholic, Protestant, Lutheran, etc. Similarly, we have educational and training models, moral, individual, and social behaviour models, financial and economic models, etc. Due to our ignorance, we model practically everything and build up constantly changing systems. In nature, there are no models or systems, because there is order. Modelling is unsuitable for recognizing the only one universal reality.