34. About you: Chapter - Three explanations (9)

 

To be able to understand the old dogmas and the new ideologies, three explanations are due. The human trinity, the body- soul,-spirit, the consciousness-, awareness,- knowledge, and the thought- word,- action are taken into account in the three explanations.We approach the One and Only as the consequence of our awareness, while in our ignorance we distance ourselves from the One and Only, the center, resulting in our individual self overruling our universal self. Hereafter, we shall attempt to interpret the above said types of domination as 1. the biblical original sin, 2. the ignorance used by our Initiating Master and 3. over the times occurred changes in the concept of sin.

As the One and Only created his creature with love and allowed him into the world without sin, the validity and equality of sin is not applicable to everyone. We are not equal in respect of sin, it is not a gift, but the subsequent result of our aberrant and ignorant behaviour. Not the source but the result, not the cause but the effect. Those, who not distinguish the cause and the effect, are dismantling our universality, and behave in an aberrant way. The reason behind the dismantling of our universality is to exercise power over us. The power exercise induces fear and a desire in us. Fear and escape result in sinking into the material.

The original sin has previously been seen as something faultiness, wrong action, see the biblical interpretation of expulsion from space (Paradise), meaning, if we are doing something wrong, we are committing a sin. People should have been told and been made aware of - by their parochial teachers-, that good and bad are not separated, they are pairs of duality. Should we treat them as separate entities, we would demolish the unified entirety. The church focused on forgiveness by action, instead of by thoughts and words, thus separating people and the unified entirety. Our Initiating Master did not teach us to be neither good nor bad, these concepts are misleading, and exists only in people’s minds, but not in reality. He asked us to love each other as he loves us. In other words, to be vigilant and responsible towards one another and to our own selves. He was the one, who abolished the original sin and corrected Moses’s mistakes. Nonetheless, we still insist upon it, even today. So what have we learned in the last two thousand years?

To understand the religious sin equality, the power exercise, we have to revert back to the time of the first created man, to the old Christianity. In the classical sense, the spiritual man living in coexistence and space with the One and Only, had to withstand a test of the possibility of choice. Having had to testify his preparedness and maturity, and his ability to distinguish between the spirit and material, in the Script being symbolised by two trees. The tree of the spirit bore no fruit, ergo the spirit was invisible to the eye nor could it be touched. However, the tree of the material did have visible fruit. The parable is not only about the visible, tangible materialistic temptation, but also is about us not enough prepared for receiving the invisible spirit and wisdom. Nowadays it is none the more different. In Hungarian folk tales, a similar situations of choices can be found, whereas the hero has to make his choice between a shiny and a shabby treasure chest. The wise fairy-tale hero decides on the shabby one, while the ignorant hero’s choice is the shiny one. Would equality really exist between people - in anything at all , than it is the freedom of choice or the choice of freedom, ergo the returning. We always have to choose between two ways, two options. Taking the risk and the free choice have always been given to us, nowadays as well as in the future. The One and Only provided us with the opportunity of a free will, all in order to enjoy the freedom of choice and taking the risks.