28. About you: Chapter 3: The bluff

 

One characteristic of the democratic mass society immersed in the material is mass psychosis like the social equality, democratic behaviour, anxiety for tomorrow, concern for acquired comfort level, excessive consumption, information hunger, global - citizen behaviour and endless use of modern technical devices. This process is a particular feature of big metropolitan cities, where people breed like ants. Mass psychosis fails to support retreat, meditation, silence order and immersion in transcendence. However it aids the mass man’s life in prose ecstasy, as well as assisst the impersonal quantitative man to look outside himself, who permanently is in a need of the new, the additional magical adventure, gloss, glory and glamour.

As an example, we can refer to the global citizen, travelling around the globe, or a person from Europe, void of national identity and affinity, no permanent resident of anywhere and nowhere, and regardless of any given locality has a good time. This is the man, who is no earthly representative of the One and Only, but a being in whose mind Darwinism, evolutionism, progress and development still to be found. The modern, liberal, globalist man is a paradox: firstly thinking of himself as a human being i.e. a superior compared to various animal species, on the other hand is able to lower himself in a beastly way to materialism, excessive consumption, drugs, sex, in total a nihilism. This paradox is undisturbed in his case, for he fails to grasp the meaning of it as such e.g. love. The life of the mass man and of the global citizen is easy-flowing, for in their belief democratic equality is based upon the material, and neither on the spirit nor on tradition. One of democracy’s feature is equalising members of the society in the material. The mass man sets no questions: how could we all be equal, since we are all different, actually we are all basically different. Should forced equality be established? Notwithstanding, may I be more equal than others? Would equality be good at all? Should equality as such given, than what is the meaning of having been chosen?

The self, the ego is the key to the solution. Thus, the case, when a reverse question is set, as he states his unwillingness for having to be the same as the others. No constitution of any country proclaims equality to their citizens, but states equal human rights for everyone. Law as such, is applicable to the material, maybe to a body, but not to the free spirit. As it is known from past history, employment of the equality principle always resulted in different forms of manipulated revolutions or wars. Revolution or war were the lawnmower principle, the streaming, meaning spiritual deprivation, confusion, all in order to introduce a new power status quo, as well as to rearrange the power structures and the system. Generally speaking, revolutions strived for equal material rights, however, the result often showed a loss of equal rights. As yet, no spiritually aimed revolution has taken place, besides the order making activity of our Initiating Master. Speaking of revolutions, of qualitative change, the above having been the one and only case in the last two thousand years.